Reflections on Roe 8

PIERS VERSTEGEN is the director of the Conservation Council of Western Australia. This week’s THINKING ALLOWED is the second and final part of his thoughts on the environmental campaign that helped stop Roe 8.

IN the last desperate and dying days of the Barnett Government, Western Australians witnessed shocking crimes against the environment and community.

Day after day the bulldozers tore through the tuarts, banksias, balgas, and paperbarks that form the unique and ancient ecology of Coolbellup and Beeliar Boodja. Day after day bandicoots, birds, reptiles, and other wildlife were killed or injured as locals and animal welfare experts helplessly looked on.

Day after day we mourned as Aboriginal sacred places more ancient than the pyramids were destroyed – our own State Government behaving like teenage vandals throwing rocks through the stained-glass windows of a cathedral.

The path of destruction will now be restored into a community wildlife corridor – a place of learning and connection to culture, and a recreational, ecological, and tourism asset.

But it was not just the Beeliar Wetlands that were trashed by the Barnett Government. In fact, the direct physical damage may be minor compared to the damage that was done to our environmental laws and agencies, and our trust in government.

For so many reasons, Roe 8 became one of the worst failures of government and law in the history of our State. We cannot simply let it slip into the history books.

From the very beginning of the planning process, to the felling of the last tree in the Beeliar Wetlands, almost every element of the project revealed serious flaws in the policies, laws, and agencies that are supposed to protect our environment, health, and heritage.

As the wetlands are restored, we must also ensure these laws and policies are rebuilt and strengthened to provide the protection that our environment and communities need, and to ensure that what happened with Roe 8 can never happen again.

Thanks to Roe 8, the inadequacy of environment and heritage laws in WA is no longer an abstract concept discussed only within an echo chamber of environmentalists and academics.

It is something that literally thousands of people understand deeply and personally after witnessing important protections being subverted and ignored. Safeguards that we took for granted were treated as mere inconveniences by a government determined to press ahead with its agenda – no matter what the environmental cost.

A Senate Inquiry uncovered serious breaches of environmental conditions during the course of the project, but this barely touched the surface.

After refusing to give evidence to the inquiry, the EPA’s latest response suggests that the environmental conditions on the project were in fact legally unenforceable – perhaps deliberately written this way.

Blatant disregard

Rather than being compelled to actually follow the conditions, the proponent was simply required to submit reports saying the conditions had been followed. As long as these reports were provided, the Office of the EPA had no power to intervene – even when hundreds of community reports, and countless pages of painstakingly collected written and photographic evidence showed a blatant disregard for those conditions.

Roe 8 has also revealed that even if the EPA had recommended stronger conditions, under the current laws only the Environment Minister can compel a proponent to cease work. In the history of the EPA such action has never been taken.

For a Minister to shut down a private sector operation would cause a major political headache. For a politically charged government-led project like Roe 8, the chances a Minister would ever intervene are virtually zero – no matter how serious the breaches.

To do so would be to admit serious incompetence in the management of the project by the government.

This is precisely why other regulatory agencies and the police force operate under a separation of powers, which takes such enforcement decisions out of the political arena.

The same separation must be established for the enforcement of environmental conditions.

Perhaps the most significant and controversial condition on the Roe 8 project was the requirement to establish an environmental ‘offset’, for the damage done to the Beeliar Wetlands.

The EPA’s policy on environmental offsets has two critical elements: firstly, offsets are only to be used as a last resort after all other attempts to minimise environmental damage have been exhausted; and secondly, offsets cannot be used where ‘critical environmental assets’ (such as the endangered ecosystems of the Beeliar Wetlands) are at risk.

During the assessment of Roe 8, the Barnett Government’s EPA (which was also revealed by the Government to have conflicts of interest at the board level) ignored both important principles in order to provide approval for the Roe 8 project.

Initially, the court struck down the approval for Roe 8 due to this failure to follow due process. This triggered a panicked review to determine which other policies the EPA had not been following in their assessments.

After further issues were identified, rather than lifting their game to comply with their own policies, the agency – no doubt acting under political pressure – instead chose to scrap or significantly water down those policies, including in a wide range of areas unrelated to Roe 8.

These policies were there for a reason. They protect our health. They protect the water we drink and the air we breathe. They protect an ancient and fragile ecology that exists nowhere else on the planet. The trashing of these policies is an appalling legacy of the Roe 8 project which must be corrected urgently.

These are just some examples of the legacy of trashed policies and safeguards that the Roe 8 project has left in its wake. An inquiry with the powers of a Royal Commission must be established by the McGowan Government to reveal the full scale of the damage, and to recommend how to prevent it from ever occurring again.

This is not only critical for our environment and our communities, but it is essential to restore the faith of Western Australians in our State Government and its agencies.

4 responses to “Reflections on Roe 8

  1. Another pile of dribble
    Why do they waste paper space on this

    Court case after court case allowed this project to move ahead

    In the future it will come back on the agenda

    As, from a common sense point of view it does make sense

    I wonder what cave he sent the email from.
    Just think of all those servers running on coal juice

  2. Excellent article! Roe 8 was a disaster and it serves as a warning to fix our environmental laws.

  3. Democracy requires of voters to be active participants and watchdogs. And sometimes even activists. Against blatant abuse by the government of the day of process, procedure and authorities. Like the police which too often are used to bulldoze through improper policies, like with Roe 8. Especially when governments become so increasingly arrogant and divorced from the requirements and demands of its voters. Thanks to the protectors of the wetlands and organisations like the Conservation Council of WA who continued their democratic non-violent direct action. So, no Bob, I don’t think is “another pile of dribble”. I think this is a well-argued case, based on evidence, that it is up to each of us to make democracy work.

  4. None of these revelations surprise me. In my field of air pollution monitoring I came up against the intransigence of the DER (Department of Environmental Regulation). These clowns trashed the standard method provisions for air pollution monitoring at source and did a lot of damage to industry regulation in general. From my own personal professional experience the Barnett government progressively trashed environmental protections through their tampering and watering down of regulations. No accountability whatsoever. Project approval at any cost was their mantra.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s